AFER attorney confident in Prop 8 case and brief filed to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

October 19, 2010 at 5:21 pm 25 comments

Cross-posted from LGBTPOV.

By Karen Ocamb

Ted BoutrousThe American Foundation for Equal Rights held a conference call on Tuesday to discuss the brief they filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The legal team believes that US District Court Judge Vaughn Walker was correct in his ruling that – as AFER’s Yusef Robb put it- Proposition 8 is “clearly and unequivocally unconstitutional.”

Lead attorney Ted Boutrous (pictured) told reporters that the US Supreme Court has already held in 14 cases that “marriage is a fundamental right of all persons and it’s a fundamental relationship – the most important relationship in life.” He said when you put cases such as Loving v Virginia (right to marry), Lawrence v. Texas (individual liberty), and Evans v Romer (equal protection) together with the marriage cases, “the law is overwhelmingly on our side.”

Boutrous said that the Prop 8 proponents failed to provide any factual evidence at trial. “Their arguments got narrower and narrower once their lawyer admitted he did not know what harm would occur as a result of same sex couples getting married.” Additionally, he said, the Prop 8 proponents “really distorted” what happened at the trial in their brief.

Last Thursday, Oct. 14, UC Irvine Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky expressed concern in a conference call sponsored by Equality California that a new governor or attorney general would decide to defend Prop 8 – as Republicans Meg Whitman and Steve Cooley have promised to do, if elected. The noted law professor said a court might feel the case needs a defendant with standing if the Defendant-Interveners are found to lack standing to appeal Judge Walker’s ruling. At the very least, their friend-of- the-court briefs could influence the final ruling.

But Boutrous said the plaintiffs’ team is not concern – “whatsoever.”

“First, I’m not sure procedurally they could do it. But we’re not afraid of anyone’s arguments and anyone getting their views across in this case because we think we’re right on the law and we’re right on the facts. We think if there is a new attorney general and a new governor and they express their views, we’ll address it and deal with it. But that doesn’t concern us at all.”

The Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in December.

UPDATE BY EDEN: More from Lisa Leff at the Associated Press:

In a brief filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals late Monday, the attorneys for the couples who successfully sued to strike down Proposition 8 countered arguments that Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the U.S. District Court in San Francisco conducted a one-sided trial.

They say the evidence was overwhelmingly in their favor because lawyers for the voter-approved measure’s sponsors decided to call only two witnesses compared with the plaintiffs’ 17, and they failed to provide credible studies or convincing corroboration for their claim that marriage should be limited to a man and woman to promote responsible childbearing.
ad_icon

Those proponents “now attempt to fill the evidentiary void they left in the district court with an avalanche of non-record citations, distortions and misstatements regarding the proceedings below, and baseless attacks on the good faith of the district court,” the couples’ lawyers said. “The tactic is unfortunate, unbecoming and unavailing.”

Entry filed under: Press, Prop 8 trial, Statements.

SEMI-BREAKING: MILITARY RECRUITERS TOLD TO ACCEPT GAY APPLICANTS BREAKING: JUDGE PHILLIPS REFUSES STAY OF INJUNCTION ON “DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL”

25 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Kathleen  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    Reply
    • 2. Ann S.  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:26 pm

      §

      Reply
      • 3. JonT  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:37 pm

        Reply
      • 4. StraightForEquality  |  October 19, 2010 at 6:32 pm

        Reply
    • 5. Ray in MA  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:44 pm

      Well you people have a lot to say!

      Reply
  • 6. Kathleen  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    LCR v USA (DADT) Application for emergency stay denied

    Reply
    • 7. Kathleen  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:49 pm

      It was expected, but it’s now official. I’m sure the DOJ will file an application with the 9th Circuit asap. Nothing on the case docket there yet. Maybe not until morning. Anyway, I’ll be away from my computer for a while, so you’ll have to rely on media reports for a bit. :)

      Reply
      • 8. Sheryl Carver  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:54 pm

        Once again, thank you so much, Kathleen!

        Like many others, I’ve been checking & rechecking all day, waiting for the official filing.

        Reply
    • 9. Bob Barnes  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:55 pm

      Thanks, Kathleen!

      Reply
  • 10. Santa Barbara Mom  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    OT ~ there is a ward member writing a paper and has asked me the following:

    “My paper focuses on the minority of what I’m learning is
    called the non gay. I guess those who have SSA and yet are ego dystonic . Any good info for this seemingly “forgotten” population?”

    Last night she emailed me and said she had been studying about Narth this past week and what were my feelings. I literally started shaking and had to wait a couple of hours before I could send a tactful reply, as my husband reminded me that she doesn’t know anything about this topic. Could anyone here help me with a reply or sites I can refer her to?

    Reply
  • 15. Rhie  |  October 19, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    Tick Tock…

    Reply
  • 16. Ronnie  |  October 19, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    “He said when you put cases such as Loving v Virginia (right to marry), Lawrence v. Texas (individual liberty), and Evans v Romer (equal protection) together with the marriage cases, “the law is overwhelmingly on our side.””

    It’s like a trifecta of WIN right there…I love it…..<3…Ronnie

    Reply
  • 17. Alan E.  |  October 19, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    No fair. I came home with 2 posts to read and the rest of the AFER brief.

    Also, I’m due at my lesbian neighbors’ house in 30 minutes for cheesecake.

    Reply
    • 18. Elizabeth Oakes  |  October 19, 2010 at 8:13 pm

      No fair. You get cheesecake.

      Reply
      • 19. Bryan  |  October 19, 2010 at 9:36 pm

        I got Cheesecake factory yesterday after accidentally blowing $80 on No-Bust California Blackjack at Bay 101…. the french fries and two happy-hour mojitos made the pain of losing money all better… but I think mojitos from the Cheesecake factory might just be magical like that.

        Reply
  • 20. Aaron  |  October 19, 2010 at 6:31 pm

    olson/boies/boutrous…et al….gotta love em….

    Reply
  • 21. Richard A. Walter (soon to be Walter-Jernigan)  |  October 19, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    We are going to win, but I truly will be glad when this is over and marriage equality is the law of the land instead of marriage discrimination.

    Reply
    • 22. Elizabeth Oakes  |  October 19, 2010 at 8:16 pm

      *nods vigorously in agreement* It will be nice to not have heart attacks waiting for briefs, appeals, and decisions anymore. CAN’T. WAIT.

      (though we all have to.)

      Reply
  • 23. Richard A. Walter (soon to be Walter-Jernigan)  |  October 19, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    Forgot the subscribe button again!

    Reply
  • 24. Sagesse  |  October 19, 2010 at 7:10 pm

    Checking the box.

    Reply
  • 25. Paul in Minneapolis  |  October 20, 2010 at 6:18 pm

    Those proponents “now attempt to fill the evidentiary void they left in the district court with an avalanche of non-record citations, distortions and misstatements regarding the proceedings below…”

    So that’s their “strategy.” Try to bury the 9th circuit with their already discredited “evidence” in hopes that the 9th will be so overwhelmed that it just caves in.

    I’d ask if the morons actually think this tactic will work, except that I already know the answer.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Support the Prop 8 Trial Tracker

Connect with us

Get to know your fellow Prop 8 Trial Trackers on Facebook.

Please send tips to prop8trial@couragecampaign.org

Follow us on Twitter @EqualityOnTrial

Sign-up for updates on the Prop 8 trial, including breaking-news alerts.

Categories

TWITTER: Follow us @EqualityOnTrial

Share this

Bookmark and Share

SITE STATS (by Wordpress)

  • 4,585,303 views of the Tracker and counting as of today...